Template:Did you know nominations/Lorenzo de Monacis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lorenzo de Monacis[edit]
- ... that Venetian ambassador Lorenzo de Monacis defended Hungarian queens Mary and Elizabeth from murder charges by writing a poem?
- Reviewed:
asapTemplate:Did you know nominations/Congenital lactic acidosis after suggestion by reviewer.
- Reviewed:
Created by Dr.K. (talk). Self-nominated at 07:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC).
- New enough, nominated the day of creation. Long enough, at 2875. The article is written in a neutral, dispassionate manner. Each paragraph is sourced with inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues detected. (see following comment on hook). The hook is interesting, within formatting policy, and is interesting. It is directly attributable to a cited source. It should be noted that while it uses many of the same words as the source, the sentence structure is independent, and these words are common usage, and there is probably no alternate way to describe the fact. No image to check. This is an interesting, well-written article deserving of mainspace exposure, but the
QPQ is not done yet. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you very much 78.26 for your nice words and for this eloquent and interesting review. It is one of the best I have read and I really appreciate it. I have done the QpQ with Template:Did you know nominations/Congenital lactic acidosis. Best regards. Dr. K. 04:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Complete, ready, per above. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 04:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- New enough, nominated the day of creation. Long enough, at 2875. The article is written in a neutral, dispassionate manner. Each paragraph is sourced with inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues detected. (see following comment on hook). The hook is interesting, within formatting policy, and is interesting. It is directly attributable to a cited source. It should be noted that while it uses many of the same words as the source, the sentence structure is independent, and these words are common usage, and there is probably no alternate way to describe the fact. No image to check. This is an interesting, well-written article deserving of mainspace exposure, but the
