The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jack Frost (talk) 08:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment: When we say we overhauled this article, we mean it. This was a massive rewrite to make the article both encyclopedic in tone and reflecting the history the station has had... we wound up removing 2,000 words but simultaneously adding a lot more content and refs.
Overall: The article is new and long (though no longer a wall of text it used to be, thank you very much), and much more pleasurable than before you started expansion. Sourcing is good, no neutrality issues detected. Earwig, after "thinking" for about 10-15 minutes trying to analyse the sources (a ton of them), has not detected any plagiarism. The hook is cited and the ALT0 is definitely the winner among the three. Image is OK. QPQ is not yet needed, but be reminded that you are running out of credits (you will have used up 3 credits by the time the review is closed; starting from 5, you will have provide proof of QPQ). Overall, I am happy to state that the article has Passed the DYK review. Personally, after expanding the lead of the article, I'd set sights for an FA nomination. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Szmenderowiecki: I did want to let you know that I had reviewed the DYK nom for Hurricane Pali as a QPQ prior to submitting this nomination, but accidentally forgot to include it. Thank you so much for the kind words and the encouragement. :) Nathan Obral • he/him • t • c • 18:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The article is new and long (though no longer a wall of text it used to be, thank you very much), and much more pleasurable than before you started expansion. Sourcing is good, no neutrality issues detected. Earwig, after "thinking" for about 10-15 minutes trying to analyse the sources (a ton of them), has not detected any plagiarism. The hook is cited and the ALT0 is definitely the winner among the three. Image is OK. QPQ is not yet needed, but be reminded that you are running out of credits (you will have used up 3 credits by the time the review is closed; starting from 5, you will have provide proof of QPQ). Overall, I am happy to state that the article has 
Passed the DYK review. Personally, after expanding the lead of the article, I'd set sights for an FA nomination. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)