Template:Did you know nominations/Intermittent water supply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Effectively withdrawn per author's request.PMC(talk) 00:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Intermittent water supply

Created by FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk). Self-nominated at 17:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC).

  • Will review. Making some copyedits first. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 20:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
    • OK, worthy article. Created Jan 2 and nominated in time on Jan 9. Long enough, Earwig does not suggest copyvio, references look very good (some behind paywall). QPQ begun. Some suggestions:
      • Page 37 here (which you cited) has a lot more tangible detail that would be very useful to add to the article (causes like poor metering and low tariff; anxiety, bribes and other issues – basically human details). Not necessary to do now, but something to put on a to-do list.
      • However, please do make sure to redo the sentence that starts "Associated factors resulting from an intermittent supply" – are you just saying that when water is intermittent, users are forced to collect water at the same time (when the pipes are flowing), putting further strain on the system? Good thing to note, but it's hard to understand that sentence.
    • Last, the hooks. Part of ALT1 is interesting but I don't love the phrasing. How about:
    • If that's accurate, could you pull quotes from a source to support it? (I'm paywalled by [1]) Hameltion (talk, contribs) 21:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Note: This was deleted as G7 but since another editor did make edits to it, I believe the G7 was invalid and have undeleted it. Since the OP is indef-blocked, and the nom is no longer on the DYK page, basically this should be treated as withdrawn. ♠PMC(talk) 00:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)