Template:Did you know nominations/Infrastructure Cost Review
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Infrastructure Cost Review[edit]
- ... that Infrastructure UK's 2010 Infrastructure Cost Review led to savings of £3 billion in British government expenditure on infrastructure in 2014? "This year’s report demonstrates significant improvements arising from more collaborative behaviour, and identifies over £3 billion per annum of cost savings
- ALT1:... that the Infrastructure Cost Review looked to make a 15% saving in British government infrastructure spending? "There is a clear opportunity to realise savings of at least 15 percent"
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 12:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC).
Length, history and references for both hooks verified; copyvio check comes back "unlikely", although maybe I wouldn't use so many quotes.I wish there were a possibility for some more interesting hooks—government review of spending finds ways less could be spent? Shocking ...—but after reviewing the article, well, you go to DYK with the facts you have, not the facts you'd like to have. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
