Template:Did you know nominations/Hoverberget

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 11:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hoverberget[edit]

Created/expanded by Philaweb (talk). Self nom at 15:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

  • The article largely relies on a single source with only the hook being referenced. Needs more references. Vensatry (Ping me) 05:53, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for taking the time to review this DYK-submission. Well, there are only a few options when it comes to reliable references; the municipality website, the county website and the website of the corresponding EU-institution. They are now all represented. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 09:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Article is just over 1500 characters, which I think is fine for this less known mountain. It is better to add citations to the sentences on Hoverbergsgubben and Storsjöodjuret. ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 16:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for taking the time to review this DYK-submission. I am not quite sure why I need citations to Storsjöodjuret, when it has its own article with references. I have rewritten the text a bit about the Hoverbergsgubben and added inline citations. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 18:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Great! About Storsjöodjuret: What I meant was that an inline citation is necessary for the claim that the observation tower is used to look for the lake monster. I guess the Swedish language citation (no. 7) contains that info. ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 18:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • AGF on the Swedish language citations. Good to go! ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 18:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)