Template:Did you know nominations/Fuzzy-trace theory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Length and referencing

Fuzzy-trace theory

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Fuzzy-trace theory is directly involved with medical decision making?

Created/expanded by Miolia (talk). Self nom at 17:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

• Length and newness. Before expansion: 50 kB (7285 words) "readable prose size" on 2 March. After: 8415 B (1317 words) "readable prose size". Not five fold by a long shot. Article has long tracks of uncited text. --LauraHale (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

No amount of saving is going to get this article up to five fold expansion AND it has major issues with lack of inline citations fully supporting the text. --LauraHale (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I already answered you right after your response in the Good article tools section. Miolia (talk) 20:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)