Template:Did you know nominations/Fugitive dust
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fugitive dust[edit]
"Escaping" fugitive dust
- ... that fugitive dust escapes? Source: "Dust generated from these open sources is termed 'fugitive' because it is not discharged to the atmosphere in a confined flow stream" Ref 2
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jaguar (American rocket)
- Comment: I know the hook doesn't have (pictured), it seems unnecessary to make the connection in this case with a very short hook.
Created by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 02:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC).
- @MB: Are you wanting this to be for April Fools Day? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- The C of E, No. Have you read the article? Why would you suggest April Fool's? MB 20:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Amusing hook, ideal for final-hook status, and cited. Article size and date check out; image is Commons and CC licensed. QPQ done. I would suggest perhaps adding something to the article explaining what "confined flow stream" and "ducted emitter" mean by contrast, but that isn't something to hold up the hook with. Good to go. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
