Template:Did you know nominations/Enrique Jackson
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 14:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Enrique Jackson[edit]
... that Enrique Jackson directed Liconsa between 1983 and 1985, then served on an investigative commission in the Chamber of Deputies examining its parent, CONASUPO?
- Reviewed: Antigonid–Nabataean confrontations
- Comment: Last revision had two external links, both dead, no inline citations, and 972 chars readable prose
2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 04:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC).
This article is a two-fold expansion of an unreferenced BLP and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are mostly supported by inline citations, but the fact that CONASUPO is the parent company of Liconsa is not. The article is neutral but the Spanish language sources make it difficult for me to consider copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
-
- ALT1: ... that Enrique Jackson was designated to represent the Chamber of Deputies in the Constitutional Assembly of Mexico City after the original selection drew backlash? Raymie (t • c) 00:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Cwmhiraeth, can you please check ALT1? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC) Raymie (t • c) 00:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1b: ... that Enrique Jackson was designated to represent the Chamber of Deputies in the Constitutional Assembly of Mexico City after the original selection was controversial?
- ALT1: ... that Enrique Jackson was designated to represent the Chamber of Deputies in the Constitutional Assembly of Mexico City after the original selection drew backlash? Raymie (t • c) 00:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
ALT1 is acceptable, and I have also proposed ALT1b because "drew backlash" sounds odd to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
