Template:Did you know nominations/Echat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Echat, Union of Ethiopian Marxist-Leninist Organizations, Waz League, Abyotawit Seded, Ethiopian Marxist-Leninist Revolutionary Organization[edit]

Created/expanded by Soman (talk). Self nom at 11:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

  • "The formation of Imaledih was actively supported by the ruling Derg military junta.[4]" In there reference, see the sentence that starts "As a result of..." (although the grammar is really twisted in the reference). --Soman (talk) 08:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
  • This reference appeared in 3 out of the 5 articles: UEMLO, Seded and Malerid. I fixed the refs for UEMLO article so that the ref appears directly after the sentences. I reworded the passage in the Seded article for clarity. In the Echat article there was the wording "During this period leading members of Echat were hunted down and jailed.[7]", but i've added the "crushed" reference also now. The Waz League article has the passage "Following the break between the Derg and the Waz League, the Waz League was purged.[11]" --Soman (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Are you saying that the 2nd half of the hook is not encyclopedic content for the Imaledih article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I don't understand the question. --Soman (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • It is, for three sentences (Imaledih is the Amharic acronym for UEMLO). --Soman (talk) 08:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
  • A drive-by comment: This is a quintuple hook. I'm under the impression that the author/nominator has to do a total of 5 peer reviews. Right? --PFHLai (talk) 05:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I was unsure of this, I haven't done any such multihooks since the new system was put in place. --Soman (talk) 08:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Now I have reviewed 5 nominations. --Soman (talk) 10:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)