Template:Did you know nominations/Difficult To Give Cibara

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 ^talk 18:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
No progress toward resolving issues for over a week

Difficult To Give Cibara

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that three-cibara is a four-piece wearing cloth, so that there is doyajika, underwear, cibara and katibandhani to wear for the Buddhists?

Created/expanded by Dipankan001 (talk). Self nom at 16:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

• Hook unsourced. The article has got only a single source and needs a lot of work. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Inline-citation given. Dipankan ^{In the woods?} 15:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Size, date all okay. Foreign language reference accepted in good faith. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm striking off my comment as the page is under construction. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

• This article is currently tagged with {{under construction}}, and should not be used on MainPage till construction is done. Also 'History' section has no refs. Actually, there are no footnotes after the first sentence of the second paragraph. Need more refs and a re-review afterwards. --PFHLai (talk) 13:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the {{under construction}} template. Also

reference given. Dipankan ^{In the woods?} 14:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing the tag will not do. See PFHLai's comments. The article needs more references. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

• The article needs more references and cleanup for MOS issues. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
• No response to the above comments since January 28, no work done on the article since that date, although nominator/author was active on a daily basis from January 28 to February 3. Rejected for apparent lack of interest on the part of nominator/author. Marrante (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)