Template:Did you know nominations/Corporate architecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Corporate architecture

  • ... that researchers think that investing in the construction of corporate buildings can also have a social impact? Source: "Corporate architecture can help to solve a number of social problems, such as improving the community’s quality of life, providing employments opportunities, allowing the community to benefit from places of socialisation and aggregation, and offering facilities and servicesm that support culture and encourage cultural exchange." Bonfanti et al., 2016 https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2014-0532

5x expanded by Unicourse (talk). Self-nominated at 06:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC).

  • Hi Unicourse! Welcome to Wikipedia and DYK. This is indeed a new and large enough expansion. QPQ exempt as your first nomination. The hook is decently interesting, a bit on the bland side, but it will work out and it's a broad-concept topic that can be tough to write about. Some very specific notes here.
  • You don't need to manually write out every citation, especially if they have DOIs. Since you're a VisualEditor user, you can learn about this here. All you need is a DOI and you will get a nicely formatted reference using citation templates. You should also look into learning {{Cite book}}, our citation template for books, and other sources that don't have DOIs. You can even type a DOI into |Cite journal=doi and then run Citation bot and it will expand the references; I did this for many of the DOIs you supplied.
  • Citations should go at the end of the sentence for those cases where you're invoking them when you have "Author (2021)".
Overall, great work and use of academic sources. You've done well by USYD and I sincerely hope you contribute more to Wikipedia in the future. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 00:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)