Template:Did you know nominations/Corfu Channel Case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 00:32, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Corfu Channel Case[edit]

5x expanded by Mendaliv (talk). Self nominated at 00:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC).

  • This article is a fivefold expansion and is long enough and new enough. It is well-researched and referenced, the hook is cited to an offline source and QPQ has been done. The article is neutral and within policy. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I made a mistake, or at least something that should be clarified: the £843,947 judgment was actually a 1951 judgment. The merits judgment was handed down in 1949 but the compensation judgment came in 1951. See my ALT2 below. It's probably not possible to elaborate more without running over 200 characters... though if "International Court of Justice" is shortened to "ICJ" it might be doable. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 19:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)