Template:Did you know nominations/CFVO-TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

CFVO-TV

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 06:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC).

  • Approve ALT0, ALT1, ALT2 New enough (6× expansion in 7 days before nomination), long enough, neutral and well cited, with no copyvio detected (spot-checked newspapers.com sources which are displayed as graphics, preventing Earwig from comparing to article). QPQ checks out. Verified hooks ALT0 and ALT1. The inline citation for ALT2 did not verify the hook fact, but I found it in Ottawa Citizen "CFVO fades to its demise" and added an inline citation. So hook facts are good, verified, with inline citations, of good length, properly formatted, and interesting. I considered if the piped link to pornographic film might be non-neutral, but the Ontario court deemed the films "obscene" for "exploiting sex" which seems to fit (Ottawa Journal "A blue day for CFVO"). So, all good, approving all hooks. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)