Talk:You Are in Love/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this article Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background and writing[edit]

Can you put an additional source to verify the Red's release date?
Replace parameter "p" with "pp" in ref 2, 'cause it doesn't work.
It's page 78, not 77. See Clean (song), which has the same info.
For "after her birth year", use this. Refs 5 and 6 don't mention that.
Verify that at that time she was on the Red Tour. I know you put it the way it is out of logic, but maybe don't do that.
Ref 7 needs to be archieved.
Link American Songwriter in ref 9. Furthermore, change template to "cite magazine" and archive it.
Authorship and archiving missing in ref 8.

Lyrics and composition[edit]

Authorship for ref 13, 15, 16 and 18.
Archiving for ref 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18.
Change template to "cite magazine" for ref 11, 13, 15 and 18.
Change template to "cite news" to ref 12.
Delete authorship for ref 11 and change "Clash Magazine Music News, Reviews & Interviews" to "[[Clash (magazine)|Clash]]"
Just leave "David Greenwald" in authorship, delete the rest. Replace "oregonlive" to "[[The Oregonian]]
Link the websites/magazines/news in all the sources.
Fuse ref 15 and 17, they are the same.
"Swift also said that she wrote it as a commentary of Swift and Dunham's relationship." Wasn't it Antonoff?.
"Swift says she finds it difficult and boring at times. The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I don't understand it.

Comments[edit]

Hey, @Brachy0008! I'm close to resuming the review. Before I can begin, I would like to know if the research paper is complete, to make the review a little easier due to the recent AfD nomination. Thank you. Santi (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What research paper? tho i managed to add content from a book source Brachy08 _(Talk) 03:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't know. Heartfox said in the AfD that some sources are missing. It is only to know if such sources have already been obtained. Santi (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
we've got one source in. not sure about the others though. Brachy08 _(Talk) 04:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. These sources (this and this) maybe can be useful. Just maybe. Found with a cursory Google research, and I couldn't find more sources. So I would assume yes. Santi (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]