This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. EdJohnston (talk) 01:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unnecessary disambiguation, too much WP:PRECISION, Concision, Natural, recognizable (to those familiar with the topic) and WP:COMMONNAME (not to mention common sense) all support the current title. And, of course, this topic is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC (the only topic) for this title. Ignore all that to give it a longer title in the name of "consistency"? Please, no. --B2C 23:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:USPLACE applies to settlements (cities, towns, villages); counties are not settlements. USPLACE has no application here. --B2C 01:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, USPLACE applies to places, hence the name. It specifically includes a guideline for counties. ╠╣uw[talk] 22:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's true that "Countyname, Statename" is the usual way to name an American county, but that format doesn't really make sense in this case, because Yohogania County is a "lost" county. The way I read the article, it describes a no-longer-existing name for an area that that included parts of both Virginia and Pennsylvania. The two states had conflicting claims to the area from 1776 to 1779; the peaceful resolution of those claims abolished the never-officially-recognized Yohogania County. So "Yohogania County, Virginia" would be a misnomer; the "county" actually lay within two states. That is the issue here; it has nothing to do with USPLACE. --MelanieN (talk) 04:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per B2C and MelanieN (wow!). See also Talk:Henricus#Requested move, where USPLACE wasn't applied to colonial settlements with unambiguous names. --BDD (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Per B2C, MelanieN, and BDD. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 18:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is an unusual county, so I can certainly understand the opposing points. However, it's not unique: Wikipedia has articles on many other former counties in the United States, a fair number of which encompassed territory now in different or multiple states. Practically all of them are titled to specify the body under which the county was organized. For consistency both within the class as well as with USPLACE (which applies to US counties), it seems preferable to specify the state: Yohogania County, Virginia. ╠╣uw[talk] 22:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
However, most of those articles require disambiguation anyway. I don't think an extinct county would ever be primary topic over an extant one. And others, like Nansemond County, Virginia, only ever existed in a modern state. --BDD (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
