Talk:Yesterday's Enterprise/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) – talk 03:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello :) You've done a nice job with the article; should be a relatively straightforward pass. I went ahead and fixed a couple of nitpicky things, and refs and imgs are good to go! What we need now is: please mention all the guest stars, and the ratings info in the lead. Also, in the filming and casting subsection, mention/src the significance of Rachel Garrett. Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

What exactly do you want for the filming section? I'm confused as to your wording above about Garrett. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 12:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion; but at the time, wasn't Rachel Garrett considered the first depicted female Starfleet captain? Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Any more to add on the review? Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I've been waiting for the nominator to respond, and reminded him twice since on his talk, to no avail. I will wrap things up immediately, tho. :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

• Apologies, I forgot about this review, but to answer your question, no she wasn't--the Saratoga captain from Star Trek IV beat her by a few years. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 11:24, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Very good...and it looks like we can pass! I loved this episode. We really need another Star Trek series on tv :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Yesterday's Enterprise passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass