Talk:Yahoo Falls

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky.

Appalachia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Untitled[edit]

So - what stream, creek, brook, etc. is this waterfall on? That should be a Primary Fact about any article about any feature of any watercourse - well-before the other irrelevant nonsense that is in this article.74.249.77.85 (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement?[edit]

This is a good picture - but unfortunately it has a "kentuckyadventure.com" watermark across it, which suggests the copyright declaration might not be genuine. Can the author comment? Or does someone have an alternative image that is genuinely in the public domain? Mtford 18:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]