Talk:Y2K

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

On 16 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Y2K (disambiguation) to Y2K. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 16 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y2K (disambiguation) → Y2K – No primary topic between the Y2K bug and year 2000. RMXY (talk) 13:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It's not so much that there's no primary topic between 2000 and Year 2000 problem, but neither one of those articles actually uses the title Y2K, and when we consider other articles that do use the title, the bug doesn't quite make it as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Y2K (upcoming film), especially, is already getting a good number of views, and that number will only go up over the next year or two.[1] - Station1 (talk) 01:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Year 2000 problem has 48,515 views, Y2K (upcoming film) has 17,992, 2000 has 16,040 and Y2K (record producer) has 5,681[[2]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.