Talk:Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Self-referentiality[edit]

Surely "Xena Warrior Princess in popular culture" is just a longer synonym for "Xena Warrior Princess"? What next - "comics in popular culture"? "pop music in popular culture"? --Paularblaster (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see the problem: it should be called Xena: Warrior Princess in Cultural Studies (something rather different from "popular culture"). --Paularblaster (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In popular culture is the standard name. The thing should be deleted, IMHO, as the only few paragraphs of relevance could easily fit into the main series article, but it passed AfD, so it stays as is. AnmaFinotera (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"(subject) in popular culture" can be thought of as shorthand for "(subject)'s influence on popular culture".--Father Goose (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Micro-references[edit]

I read through the extremely long list of references to individual passing moments in shows and movies. Not a single one of them sounds important enough to mention, and there are really a lot of them; this is basically a list of every time the word "Xena" was mentioned. Having some in a list may make sense but we need some selectivity here... unfortunately, my normal standard (i.e. toss out passing references or one-liners, keep mentions that are at least important to the plot of the work) seems to exclude every mention we have here. So unless we can find another standard, I think not a single one of these needs to be mentioned and the entire list should be removed. Mangojuicetalk 14:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When it really comes down to it, I agree. In this case the prose sections really is extremely high quality, and the rest of the minor references do not really improve the coverage of the article subject. --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FanFics[edit]

I don't want to just change it without asking if anybody else sees a problem with it. But the term "fanfics" seems to be wrong. It's like saying "plastics". It's a quantity plural thing. You'd only use the s for pluralizing when you're talking about multiple types of the item rather than just multiple instances of it.

Umm, "FanFic" is just a portmanteau/contraction of the term/phrase "Fan Fiction". Seeing as how it was construction, I see no problem with the word "Fanfics" in reference to multiple "fan fictions".
I do however have a problem with "AltFic" and would like to call the legitimacy of the sources in general used into question. Altfic is contraction for "Alternate Fiction" or non-cannon fictions created by fans (ie, fictions that take liberties on the story while retaining some semblance of the original work- characters, setting, events). I don't think that the definition in the article has that right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also the sentence, "Followers of Xena (Fandom) has written numerous fanfictions on the series." doesn't really make sense. "Fandom" and "Followers of Xena" are not synonymous. If the fandom word is important, then it should be made clear that Xenites (fans of Xena) are part of the larger fandom community. Though I don't know how you'd word that. And shouldn't it be "have" instead of "has"? Fandom "has", but Followers of Xena "have"?

I don't want to step on anyone's toes by making changes to the article if other people don't think there's anything wrong with it. 71.227.241.43 (talk) 09:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, don't be shy. The article still needs plenty of work, including the changes you suggested. Dive right in.--Father Goose (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:X G Kiss.jpg[edit]

The image Image:X G Kiss.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. Mangojuicetalk 16:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Water Transfer?[edit]

What exactly is the "mouth-to-mouth Water Transfer filmed to look like a full kiss" supposed to be? Is it literally the transfering of water into Xena (as in they would've used a cup but there wasn't one handy at the time) or is it something else completely I'm missing, like a movie-making term... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 11:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the literal sense is meant. Florian Blaschke (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overlaps[edit]

I am not an expert on this subject. I wound up here researching Lucy Lawless. I do want to say that the three sub-sections of "Fandon and Unofficial Sequences" (the second major section) have a lot of overlap. For example:

  • "popularized the term altfic" in FanFic vs. "also popularized the term Altfic" in Influence
  • "Jokes, innuendo, and other subtle evidence" in Influence vs. "humorous lesbian innuendo" in Shipping
  • "subtext" (all three sections)

Even when the three sub-sections don't use the same words, they're basically re-telling the same material under different headings, possibly with different sources and from a slightly different point of view.

Couldn't someone more knowledgeable than I streamline all of this? Or turn it into an explicit "all significant viewpoints" perspective without the redundancy; see WP:UNDUE.

And, by the way, what "Unofficial Sequences" (in the section heading)?

--RoyGoldsmith (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Xena: Warrior Princess in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]