Talk:Woodie (car body style)

Reversions[edit]

Copied from user talk page: I'd like to reiterate, as I have stated before, and many others have stated before here, that it might be advisable that you, Vegavairbob, review WP:Ownership. I made numerous changes to the Woodie article, citing each change with a reason for the revision. You essentially undid all those changes. Let me know how you propose to collaborate with me, and the other editors who have pointed out the WP:ownership issue. It goes to the core of what Wikipedia is about. 842U (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article looked like crap with duplicated images, too many spaces and images and text deleted (your text wasn't deleted, but some of mine had to be added back, again) And images should only be deleted if low quality. I don't delete images. If article becomes crowded with them I add them to a gallery. I have over 10,000 edits of mostly added text, not altered text. so why don't you please end the ownership accusations. Vegavairbob (talk) 02:55, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a "looks like crap" guideline here at Wikipedia, from what I can tell. I have advised you about the ownership guidelines -- and so have others. From what I can tell, there's a pattern in a number of articles of your acting as if you own the article, e.g., here, here (Handling Section) and here. Crowding and crappiness are specious arguments here. If you would be so kind as to reconsider the ownership guidelines, please let's focus on cooperative and collaborative editing. 842U (talk) 10:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization?[edit]

It seems to me the term should not be capitalized, but this article is mixed. I am going to make it consistent. Huw Powell (talk) 01:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Woodie (car body style). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130810160707/http://beyondtheperf.com/stamp-series to http://beyondtheperf.com/stamp-series

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Just Ford![edit]

" By 1955, only is Ford, Mercury, joined in 1965 by Chrysler offered a "woodie" appearance, evoking real wood with other materials including steel, plastics and DI-NOC (a vinyl product)" is WRONG...Edsel Bermuda would have it in 1958...and Rambler Cross Country's last year for the fake wood look was 1956...2601:18E:C501:E4F3:7ACA:39FF:FEB2:EFCB (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Woodie (car body style). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]