Talk:William Goebel/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk · contribs) 21:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello there again! I‘ll be taking this one. I hope to complete this review over the next few days (hopefully less time than he was in office) so stay tuned. Looking forward to reading more about Mr Goebel! ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @ExcellentWheatFarmer – Just so you know, this was a featured article before June 2021, when it was delisted because books didn't had page numbers! I fixed all that, and think that it is ready for GA review. Also, this is my attempt to save this featured topic. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I noticed! Most the sourcing issues seem to have been fixed, but I don't own/have access to most of the books cited, so it'd be appreciated if you could do a small spot-check of them all (aside from Harrison 2004), just to make sure it's correct.
Alright @Kavyansh.Singh, I'm happy to pass this article now. Any other thoughts? ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ExcellentWheatFarmer – Thanks! As for the references, are you fine with them or do I need to provide a brief spot check detail here. I'll provide you with the text of the sources for you to compare it with article's text. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The details of the spot check would be appreciated! That way you can refer back to them as evidence for the FTN. Thanks! ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

General Comments[edit]

  • Earwig's copyvio detector checks out fine.
  • The page seems mostly stable, with no edit wars or controversies on either the page itself or the talk.
  • Images are all fair use and well used. They even all have alt-text - good job!

Lede[edit]

  • Infobox seems fine.
  • "Goebel was born to Wilhelm and Augusta (Groenkle) Goebel" Clarify what Groenkle means.
  • "He studied at the Hollingsworth Business College and became an apprentice in John W. Stevenson's law firm." What year(s) did he do this?
    • Direct year is not specified by the sources, though "mid 1870s" is mentioned ... – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "While Goebel lacked the social qualities common to politicians, various authors referred to him as an intellectual man." What social qualities?
  • "In 1895, Goebel engaged in what many observers considered to be a duel with John Lawrence Sanford, a former Confederate general staff officer turned cashier." -> "In 1895, Goebel engaged in a duel with John Lawrence Sanford, a former Confederate general staff officer turned cashier."
  • "Sanford's died; Goebel pleaded self-defense and was acquitted." -> "Sanford was killed; Goebel pleaded self-defense and was acquitted."
  • "During the 1899 Kentucky gubernatorial election, Goebel divided his party with his political tactics at a time when Kentucky Republicans were gaining strength, having elected the party's first governor four years previously." What political tactics?

Heritage and career[edit]

  • Again, clarification of Groenkle would go well here, if not already in the lede.
  • "William attended school in Covington" Replace William with Goebel

Kentucky Senate[edit]

  • For Ref #6, what page number?
    • Well, Ref#6 is a biography of Goebel published in print in 1999 (online in 2000). As I am citing the online version, no page number is specified at the web page (which requires subscription)
      • Ah, understood.

Duel with John Sanford[edit]

Goebel election law[edit]

  • "Kentucky Democrats, who controlled the General Assembly, believed that county election commissioners had been unjust in selecting local election officials, and which had unfairly contributed to the election of Republican governor William O. Bradley in 1895." This could be reworded to be more neutral.

Gubernatorial election of 1899[edit]

  • Replace "electrified".
  • "This put Stone's supporters in a difficult position. They were forced to choose between Hardin, who was seen as a pawn of the railroads, or Goebel. " Merge these sentences.
  • "three hand-picked Goebel Democrats" -> "three hand-picked pro-Goebel Democrats"

Spot checks[edit]

I randomly have selected these 7 references, and have provided the source's text, as well as the text of the article.

Ref# Cited work Page Article text Source text Note
6.2 Wall 2000. - "Goebel graduated from Cincinnati Law School in 1877," "He [Goebel] graduated from Cincinnati Law School in 1877." -
6.5 Wall 2000. - "He campaigned on the platform of railroad regulation and labor causes. Like Stevenson, he insisted on the right of the people to control chartered corporations." " Like his mentor Stevenson, he insisted on the right of the people to control chartered corporations. In the senate, therefore, he joined with Cassius M. Clay to fight the Louisville and Nashville (L&N) Railroad, whose economic importance and powerful lobby had won undue influence over the politics of Kentucky. Governor Simon B. Buckner in 1888 recommended that the powers of the Railroad Commission be increased. " -
8 Klotter 1977 7–8 "Goebel eventually became Stevenson's partner and executor of his estate" "Eventually he became Stevenson's law partner and the exuctor (without bond) of Stevenson's large estate" -
9 Klotter 1977 9 "According to author James C. Klotter, Goebel was not known as a particularly genial person in public. He belonged to few social organizations and greeted none but his closest friends with a smile or handshake. He was rarely linked romantically with a woman" " 'Timid and awkward in ladies society' ... By the time he entered politics, Goebel lived a plain, unexciting private life. He seldom visited the theater or indicated any interest in sports ... -
17 Kentucky Legislative Research Commission 2003 15–18 "Goebel served as a delegate to Kentucky's fourth constitutional convention in 1890, [till here cited by another ref] which produced the current Constitution of Kentucky." "At the time of the 1890 Constitutional Convention .. The present Constitution, then, was twice as long as its predecessor, and four times the length of the first Constitution of Kentucky" can access here
24.1 Johnson 1916 273 "The shooting took place at 1:30 p.m. According to the witnesses, both men then drew their pistols, but no one was sure which had fired first. One of the witnesses – W. J. Hendricks, the attorney general of Kentucky, said "I don't know who shot first, the shots were so close together."" " The shooting occurred at the entrance of the First Na- tional Bank in Covington, at 1 :30 o 'clock. Mr. Sanford died about five hours after the shooting. He was shot through the head; the ball entered his forehead over the left eye at an upward range. ... The shooting followed instantly and I was so dazed and dumbfounded that I could not realize what was happening until Mr. Sanford fell face downward on the steps and Senator Goebel backed away. I declare I don't know who shot first, the shots were so close together." " can access here
35 SAGE Publications 2009 1616 "Republican William S. Taylor defeated both Democratic candidates in the general election, but his margin over Goebel was only 2,383 votes." "William S. Taylor (R) - 193,727‡ -48.1

William Goebel (D) - 191,331 - 47.5"

@ExcellentWheatFarmer – Are the spot-checks fine. Anything else? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, it all looks good. Great job! ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_Goebel/GA1&oldid=1057459240"