Talk:Wiel Arets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Euroborg Arets.jpg Deleted[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Euroborg Arets.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Mmxx for the following reason: No permission since 28 April 2011

What should I do?

You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GP Arets.jpg Deleted[edit]

An image used in this article, File:GP Arets.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Mmxx for the following reason: No permission since 28 April 2011

What should I do?

You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heren Arets.jpg Deleted[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Heren Arets.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Mmxx for the following reason: No permission since 28 April 2011

What should I do?

You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Utrecht Library1.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Utrecht Library1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger[edit]

I think Wiel Arets Architects should be merged here, as the scope overlaps. --Elekhh (talk) 11:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the articles stand at the moment, a merger would appear sensible but the other key architect in the firm is Bettina Kraus who has had quite a lot to say, for example, here. The article about the firm could be expanded along these lines - but I don't feel up to dealing with it myself at this stage! - Ipigott (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it should be the other way around. The notable projects all seem to date to a period after 1983 when the company Wiel Arets Architects was formed. I get slightly annoyed that architects and the companies they are part of, both take credit for the same projects. An alternative solution would be to significantly edit the Wiel Arets article to remove the substantial information about work that is not solely attributable to him. Sionk (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Still, the company as such is attributed to him (with the exception of that tiny "s"). Of course all architects work in teams and have some form of registered business, but generally it is the main architect credited for most of the work. This is the case with Arets as well, with all books titled Wiel Arets as also demonstrated by Wiel Arets Architects#Bibliography. This is the only case I know we have two articles of the type "X" and "X Architects", the other cases being when the firm gives more credit to the team such as "X & Partners" or is a partnership "X & Y". I am not saying all this is just (I am very much in favour of crediting the team), just searching a way to solve the massive duplication we have at this stage. I can't see any part of Wiel Arets Architects which is not duplicated in Wiel Arets. I don't think a merger now should preclude a split at a latter stage when/if the firm becomes more distinct. --Elekhh (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Wiel Arets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wiel Arets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]