Talk:Whitehead's point-free geometry
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Pointless topology[edit]
I'd like to see a few sentences comparing/contrasting this to pointless topology. linas 15:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Is C5 mistaken?[edit]
Here's C5 as it stands:
- C5.
![{\displaystyle \forall xy\exists z[Czx\land Czy].}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/9261758ee29d57845c721de2e9481cfdc40f7113)
It says that given any two regions, there exists a region connected to both of them. I cannot find a counterpart to C5 in Casati & Varzi (1999). Instead, I find there the axiom:
- C13.
![{\displaystyle \forall z\exists xy[Czx\land Czy].}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/d40e419bfd3355fba56e111326822061c025973a)
C13 says that there are at least two regions connected to any given region. In other words, there can be no "restaurant at the end of the universe." Casati & Varzi (1999: 66) attribute their C12-C14 to Process and Reality, then announce that their study will make no further use of them. (It is well-known that Whitehead botched the mereotopology that grounds his later metaphysical work, so that sound mereotopology begins with Clarke's 1980s papers.)
Which of C5 and C13 should this entry include?132.181.160.42 (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Incomplete G6[edit]
shouldn't G6 be
![{\displaystyle \forall x\exists yz[y<x\land x<z].}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b6a2370ec127330a41bce949a38c5efb840483c2)
instead of
![{\displaystyle \exists yz[y<x\land x<z].}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/be32198602ad5edbf0e42cf01ea2949124378130)
i just wanted to make sure before i edit it Pjbeierle (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Whitehead's point-free geometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717210751/http://www.dmi.unisa.it/people/gerla/www/Down/point-free.pdf to http://www.dmi.unisa.it/people/gerla/www/Down/point-free.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)