Talk:White phosphorus munitions/Archives/2010/November

Gaza war section neutrality

This section is extremely biased against Israel. Firstly, Look how long this sections is!- All about a tiny 3 week offensive done in two of the smallest territories in the world.The world war 1 and 2 section is tiny comapred to this one and that was a much bigger event. This area is section is irrelevant in a white phosphorus arrticle and should only be maximum a paragraph. If the article was put in proportion to this section than every small event in history that used WP should have a 10 paragraph section and the ww2 section should be 5 pages long. Thsi makes Israel look as if it is a country that uses tons of WP when relatively, they don't. Secondly the name of the section "Gaza war" is misleadding since it was only an "operation" and the dates make it seem as if it lasted 2 years when it only lasted 3 weeks. Also many of these claims were proven false and there is hardly any evidence presented to supproted israel's case in this section. The section also laboriously goes through a lot instead of getting to the point. I didn't put the cleanup sign because this was clearly made so long for anti-israel reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raphmam (talk • contribs) 03:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

While I agree that the section of this article is in certain ways biased, it should not be removed. I believe a proper course of action is to present "the other side of the story". Articles about this highly controversial subject are hard to keep neutral so this is the easiest to maintain option.66.32.214.169 (talk) 22:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)