This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
Talk:West Branch Susquehanna Valley is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
I dropped Renovo from the valley, because it is well north of the front. It may Be appropriate to include it in a discussion of the socieo-economic aspects, but from a geological, geographical ,and topographical perspective, it think it should be separate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhaluza (talk • contribs) 14:22, November 30, 2006
What is the basis on only including the river valley east of Lock Haven? I would think the whole West Branch Susquehanna River valley would qualify. A quick Google search for "West Branch Susquehanna Valley" found only 40 entries, most of which were from Wikipedia or forks. Just curious, Ruhrfisch 02:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Ruhrfisch. Why exclude the places that are upstream from Lock Haven?Dincher 02:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
