Talk:Wenzhou–Kean University

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HelloWorld9272 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by HelloWorld9272 (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whistleblowing and Retaliation[edit]

At Wenzhou-Kean University, an American faculty member alongside several students courageously came forward as whistleblowers, revealing egregious acts of misconduct. These included an assault and battery by a former Dean of Chinese origin against a student in June 2022, the delivery of lectures in languages other than English in violation of university policy, breaches of research ethics, and ongoing hazing and discrimination against international faculty by their Chinese counterparts .

This act of whistleblowing triggered harsh retaliatory measures from the institution, including suspensions and attacks on their reputations. Their revelations brought to light significant ethical violations within the academic framework, highlighting the profound difficulties in maintaining integrity and the dire repercussions for confronting institutional wrongdoings across cultural divides. These incidents accentuate the critical necessity for enhanced whistleblower protections and a paradigm shift toward enhanced transparency and ethical accountability in higher education. The ordeal faced by these faculty members and students underscores the dangers associated with standing up for ethical values and serves as a powerful reminder of the indispensable role that whistleblowers have in preserving the integrity of educational institutions. It demands an urgent reassessment of the ways in which academic communities support and shield individuals who call out misconduct, pushing for systemic reforms to foster a more secure and morally sound academic milieu .

Jeonghwan.choi (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place to WP:SOAPBOX. Please also divulge WP:COI. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]