Talk:We Are Family (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:We Are Family JP.gif[edit]

Image:We Are Family JP.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:We Are Family.jpg[edit]

Image:We Are Family.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge[edit]

All versions of the same song should be treated in the same article. This seems to be a standard practice; see, for example: It's My Life (Talk Talk song), which also covers the No Doubt version, or Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song), which also covers the duet single with Reba McEntire. --ShelfSkewed Talk 06:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link to The Full Monty[edit]

Should it be linked to the film The Full Monty or the soundtrack for the film? Wrongusername (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on We Are Family (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release date[edit]

For several years, the article listed the release date in the infobox as September 18, 1979. This is obviously incorrect since the record was on the charts much earlier in the year. About three years ago someone changed September to March, a more plausible date but retained the date of the 18th. It was more recently changed to May but again keeping the 18th. Neither source cited for this change support a specific release date, one refers to the UK release which was apparently later and the other references some non-specific chart information. This record entered the Billboard Hot 100, as well as the Cash Box and Record World charts, the week ending April 28, 1979 which precludes a possible release date of May or anytime after that. The song was the follow-up to a previous hit, was already a hit on the disco chart, and had a very high debut position which indicates that it probably made the chart in its first week out, making a release date of Sunday, March 18 very unlikely. The actual release date was most likely mid-April. Piriczki (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the source does not give the release date shown, you are free to remove that date. Your original research and its conclusion of "most likely mid-April", however, is a different issue.
Additionally, this leaves the change to song length unexplained.
For whatever reason, we have one or several vandals and/or incompetent editors who are making changes to exactly this type of information with either no explanation/source or very bad explanations. (One that comes to mind is that because a song was release in February 1984, it obviously must have been recorded in December 1983. Along with such logic are often unsourced/unexplained changes to, additions of or removals of song lengths, recording studios and similar information.
These editors typically have ignored all attempts to discuss the issue or have conversational styles that seem to indicate WP:CIR is a likely issue. (This clearly isn't the case here.)
In any event, given your explanation, I'm leaving the old date off, removing the new date as unsourced and restoring the previous legths. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on We Are Family (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signature Song[edit]

Should this article say that this song is often thought of as the group's signature song?Vorbee (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

checkYDone (diff). Hoof Hearted (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fainter text[edit]

Does anybody know why the three sentences under the sub-heading "Origins and meaning" appear to be in fainter text than the rest of the text?Vorbee (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These sentences were tagged in April 2017 as needing a citation {{cn}}. Hoof Hearted (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:We_Are_Family_(song)&oldid=1209320224"