Talk:Watts family

This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBC soap opera EastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders articles

Tasks for WikiProject EastEnders:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : All articles listed in Category:Stub-Class EastEnders articles and Category:EastEnders articles in need of real-world perspective
Other :
- Improve to FA standard: EastEnders: E20
- Improve to GA standard: EastEnders
- Maintain: List of EastEnders characters (2023), List of EastEnders characters, List of former EastEnders characters, List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders
- Get involved in the Wikipedia EastEnders Project.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The page tries to take a more dynamic look at the Watts family, rather than just rehashing plot, focusing instead on characterisation and theme.

Hi, thanks for all your hard work, but unfortunately there's a problem with the family tree image. It cant be released under a free licence, because the BBC owns the copyright to all thos mini images. I'm afaraid it will have to be removed.GunGagdin ^Moan 20:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No probs... I thought if I took all the images from the wiki characters pages I'd be safe?? But I can just do one minus the picks. Familiae Watts (talk) 21:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a family tree of the Watts family uploaded by Trampikey, but it doesn't look too good and it's out of date too. But yeah, what Gungadin said. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the subject of images - if I were to take a screenshot of the Watts family from the 2004 Xmas episode is that permissible to upload??? Alas I understand "copyright" when it comes to texts, but get confused when it comes to images (or rather images of images!)Familiae Watts (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I havent had time to read through the page yet but will try to get to it on the weekend. Looks great, but at first glance there may be some issues with original research and non-neutral POV in some of your prose. Will be more specific when I have time. Excellent work nonetheless though, good for you :) .GunGagdin ^Moan 00:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree - I need to rework some of the phrases and work on neutral pOV.... also put in some criticisms references that I haen't worked in yet.Familiae Watts (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some improvements for GA[edit]

OK so I'm going to list possible improvments here, will do it a bit at a time:

Starting with lead - this needs to summarise all the main points of the article. If you read science journals, the lead would be akin to what is known as an abstract, which summarises the points of a piece of work.

Using words like "greatest" will be looked on badly unless you can find a source to say they are the greatest. Even then, to save it looking like this is your opinion, it is best to say something like "they have been referred to as the 'greatest'" etc. --GunGagdin^Moan 20:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, understand... am currently going through article and rephrasing some of the more... enthusiastic terminology. ;) Thanks for all your comments.Familiae Watts (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I;ve included just about all the references I had for this article and gone through and rephrased some of the language to be a bit more academic, as well as lengthening the lead... also, timeline: keep or cut???Familiae Watts (talk) 03:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]