Talk:WLOS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Nielsen Media NOT the FCC defines TV markets. I changed the article to edit that out. 4.142.132.85 00:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Nick[reply]

Station ID: What does that small print say?[edit]

I have noticed that the WLOS station ID has what looks like a paragraph of very small print down in either the lower left hand or the lower right hand corner. It doesn't stay on long enough to allow the viewer to read the whole thing, but it looks like it says something about the City of Asheville. What is this? Note: this is NOT the same thing as the list of translators (low-powered repeaters) that appears on certain station IDs. That's fairly straightforward. This is something else, something I've never seen on any other TV station before.

Other meanings of WLOS[edit]

Can anyone find other meanings of WLOS (with no restrictions other than that it is a meaning of WLOS) by doing a Google search?? Georgia guy 17:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

______________________________________________________

The "W" of course, is the letter used by broadcast stations east of the Mississippi. The "LOS" stands for "Land of the Sky," a term coined by the Asheville Chamber of Commerse to market Asheville as a tourist destination.

Reasons for Pre-empting[edit]

Why were some programs broadcasted pre-empted is there a specific reason they wern't/

Fair use rationale for Image:Wlosnews13.png[edit]

Image:Wlosnews13.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WLOS's 60th Anniversary coming up.[edit]

On September 18, 2014, WLOS will celebrate 60 years on the air. WYFF and WMYA already celebrated 60 years on the air last year and WHNS has already celebrated their 30th this year, only that they didn't announce it. Hopefully unlike WMYA's 60th, which you may not realize that it's the first station in the GSAA metropolitan area, WLOS is the 3rd TV station to sign on for that market. I think they will do their 60th Anniversary, maybe completely different from WYFF's 60th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.213.7.78 (talk) 15:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WLOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:WLOS/GA1.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 11:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Good luck to the editors! Arconning (talk · contribs)


@Sammi Brie This'll be the comments, hope they can be addressed! Arconning (talk · contribs) 17:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS[edit]

Lede[edit]

  • Well written, no issues.

History[edit]

  • Hyperlink 1948 freeze to Federal Communications Commission#Freeze of 1948
    • Done
  • WSKY was out of the contest by August 1953,, "out of the contest" kind of informal? Would like to know an explanation :)
    • Fixed. Informality tends to crop up from time to time in my work...
  • By July, work was under way on the Mount Pisgah transmitter facility, and a September 18 start date goal had been set;[13] WLOS-TV had signed for affiliation with ABC and the DuMont Television Network.[14], what year? If it's in 1954 you could use By July of the same year... or specify.
    • Fixed with mention earlier.
  • Citizen-Times option,..., he Citizen-Times option through his other broadcast property,..., italicize Citizen-Times?
    • I am referring to the company, not the newspaper of the same name, which it owned.
  • AnchorMedia, mentions of the company should be spaced into "Anchor Media" on the sources given ([36] and [37]).
    • I will object because the papers cited are in the wrong. The company's own logo CamelCases this name. Trade journals do too.
  • It also was something of a consolation prize;, outmuscled, informal but would like to hear a reason why this is so.
    • Changed.

Programming[edit]

  • It also was initially the smallest of the three TV newsrooms in the region., change to it was also.
  • a news bureau in Spartanburg., hyperlink Spartanburg.
    • These two fixed.
  • AnchorMedia, mentions of the company should be spaced into "Anchor Media."
    • See above.

Technical information[edit]

  • FCC, hyperlink.

References[edit]

  • Add access dates on refs, [1], [3], [43]
    • [1] is generated by infobox. [3] is technically a "print" source that does not need accessdate.
      • Fair enough.
  • Would be nice to link refs [55], [66]
    • [55] and [66] were in unlinkable NewsBank full-text databases. In the time since this article was written and even since this was nominated, GenealogyBank (a NewsBank sister site) has added this paper full-run, so this is now possible.
      • Got it.
  • No original research.

Spotchecks[edit]

  • Manual checking, earwig, both shows nothing. Pass.

Images[edit]

  • All images have proper licenses and captions.
  • No copyright violations in the images.
  • Would be nice if we put some images of the notable former on-air staff on the Programming section.
    • I've never had this floated at me, and while it might work for a few articles where the people had longer stays at the station or became really famous (e.g. maybe Tom Brokaw at KTIV), it really doesn't with this crew.

Misc.[edit]

  • Article has no ongoing edit war, stable.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 683 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 19:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Recent GA with QPQ done. No copyvio detected, hooks cited and verified. Prefer the original hook. Juxlos (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]