Talk:WDCA/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to this within seven days.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 00:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There we are! On hold.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 03:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work! Pass.  LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 15:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Earwig says good to go.

Files[edit]

Good to go. File 1 is indeed public domain and files 2–5 each have valid non-free use rationales.

Prose[edit]

  • Wikilink UHF or perhaps spell it "ultra high frequency (UHF)".
  • Did Rogers elaborate on why it would not be viable?
    • Not in any specific words, but UHF stations were, uh, going through it at that time. Anyone in TV back in 1956 would have known this.
      • Noted.
  • "from Automated Electronics, Inc., of Dallas" — I do not think we need a comma after Inc. here.
  • "As part of his transition from an on-air personality to a media executive, he began going by Milton instead of Milt" — recommend "…media executive, Grant began going by Milton instead of Milt" to avoid repetition of pronouns.
  • Just curious: is there a reason Capital Broadcasting Company is not abbreviated like some of the other companies?
    • It's not really what comes to mind with "CBC". Also, there is a still-extant and operating Capitol Broadcasting Company, with an O, in North Carolina, and I wanted to avoid confusion with it.
      • Oh I see! That makes sense.
  • I reckon wikilinking construction permit is unnecessary as readers unfamiliar with building jargon will likely know what it means.
    • It has a specific meaning in broadcasting, so I think this is merited. I've had other reviewers ask for this link.
  • Wikilink tape delayed for unfamiliar readers.
      • Noted, thanks.
  • "continued to promote itself as a sports destination" — I may be in error but "destination" in this context sounds slightly on the informal side.
  • Wikilink road game.
  • Both "tape delayed" and "tape-delayed" are each used once in this article; choose one spelling variation for consistency.
    • Second one is a hyphenated adjective.
      • I see!
  • "For children, the station was the home of "Captain 20", a" sounds slightly editorialised; recommend rephrasing.
  • "From 1972 until his 1984 death" — recommend "From 1972 until his death in 1984".
  • The sentence starting "Despite being the second independent…" is a bit of a mouthful; perhaps create a new sentence for the Varity line as "It had, per Paul Harris in Variety,"?
  • "the station conducted a schedule overhaul, increased its sports and movie telecasts" needs an and to connect the sentences.
  • "investor Robert Bass, and while" — recommend a semi-colon instead of a comma.
  • "$200 million on January 1, 1988, and missed the first payment deadline" — how about but instead of and here?
  • Even though the article is titled UPN, I would wikilink United Paramount Network instead of the acronym as it looks rather strange and inconsistent. Same with the lead if you decide not to trout me for this.
  • "In 2000, Viacom purchased CBS." — wikilink CBS as first mention in the body.
  • "the United in UPN" — hm?
    • UPN was a partnership of United Television and Paramount.
      • Ooh!
  • Could Chris-Craft be wikilinked somewhere?
  • "over UHF channel 20" – already linked.
  • "including a new 8:00 p.m. prime time newscast" — perhaps wikilink prime time? Likewise for the lead.
  • In § Newscasts, are the paragraphs necessary? I reckon just being one should be fine.
    • Kept the first paragraph break — there is a very large time gap between the first and second efforts!
      • That looks much better!

@LunaEatsTuna: Anything not bulleted above has been fixed. Also see below. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • I notice that the usage of retrieval dates is inconsistent, such as with refs 5 and 19–21 among others which are online URLs.
    • Cannot do this without a URL, which is how I write my ProQuest citations.
      • Noted!
Spotcheck
Refs 5; 12; 19; 22; 38; 51; 69; and 75 all good. WP:AGF on ref 42 as it keeps crashing my nimble mobile device.
  • For ref 63, I could not seem to verify the Friendship Heights part.
    • Added a separate ref invoke.
      • Good.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.