Talk:Vyacheslav Molotov/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wustefuchs (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.

Article has correct grammar.

Also, it could be more writen about this man, since he was very important to history of World War II, and also Russian and Soviet history. Also, there are many books that deal exclusively with biography of Molotov. I also need to say that this is not criterion for good article, but it would improve article's quality.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

Truth is, article has neutral sources, and very reliable ones. But ther is one little problem at the section "Death and legacy" with No footnotes, as stated, since May 2010.

- I've fixed it. I didn't think anyone would review this article as quickly as you did. However, I am grateful, now I don't need to wait for a very long period of time! :) --TIAYN (talk) 17:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage

About this, the article is focused on Molotov's life. Good job ther, becouse topics like World War II and detals of consequences of Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact are avoided.

It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Like stated, article has neutral sources. Besides, ther is no cheering text in the article.

Article is neutral, also, I see that User:Trust Is All You Need expanded the article greatly, but he remained neutral, good job, btw. How stable article is, we'll see in few days.

Illustrated, if possible, by images.

I found that few relevant images were removed, it would be good to see them again on the article.--Wustefuchs (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, all problems fixed.... article can pass as good article.--Wustefuchs (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]