Talk:Volvopluteus gloiocephalus
Volvopluteus gloiocephalus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 7, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Volvopluteus gloiocephalus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha (talk · contribs) 06:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sasata, I'll be reviewing this article. Ucucha (talk) 06:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- You can have a variety that has nomenclatural priority over its species? That's odd.
- Well, the species was first named Agaricus gloiocephalus; it wasn't until later that mycologists started referring to it as the gloiocephalus variety of V. speciosa. I admit the taxonomy section could be fleshed out more, and I will do that if this ever visits FAC. Sasata (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Lineage" is a rather vague term to use (and our article Lineage (evolution) contradicts itself: it first defines "lineage" as an anagenetic lineage, then as a clade). Why not use "clade"?
- What do "ventricose" and "pruinose" mean?
- Is there not more to say on its distribution? For example, does it occur at high elevations, or in rainforests or deserts?
Apart from these very minor queries, it's looking good. Ucucha (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm passing the article as a GA now. Ucucha (talk) 07:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)