Talk:Virginia Satir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Satir and reconstructions[edit]

Systemic Constellations, which has been linked to Virigina Satir's work, is not the same thing as Family Reconstructions. Family Reconstructions are carefully planned and constructed events for a particular person, called the "star," that happen on a prearranged day and look over the person's life in a kind of timeline. The faciliator may have fathered props, interviewed people and otherwise produces the event. It is much more based on role play, like psychodrama, than the phenomenological process.


Distilation or dissemination[edit]

I think the text above sound blur:

"[...]However Virginia herself was known to be rather uneasy about the distillation of her work[...]"

Should not it be "dissemination of her work" instead of "distillation of her work"? See Merriam-Webster's entry: [[1]]

--Volphy 20:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I'm not quite sure what that sentence is even supposed to mean. What was best summed up by Jerry Weinberg: her work, or her uneasiness about its distillation? Even with the change I'm making, I still don't get the point. I'm a wiki newbie - I trust that if I'm making wikiquette errors in my editing that someone will set me straight.

Jay 14:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it should be distillation. Jerry Weinberg's quote which supports this is that he wanted the chicken (Virginia Satir) and not the chicken soup (NLP).

--Ambitus 20:34, 19 October 2006 (BST)

Reference to Names[edit]

Is it standard to refer to people by their first or last name alone after giving their full name at first? She is referred to as Virginia in the second para, then Virginia Satir in the third - should it just be Satir? Guidelines say to be bold - so I'm changing it. ;o)

Jay 14:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I don't know what the Wikipedia standard is, but I read somewhere that Virginia Satir disliked being referred to as Satir.

--Ambitus 11:25, 23 October 2006 (BST)

Our Manual of Style is quite clear that we refer to the subject by their family name, not their given name or nickname, unless the use of the give name is necessary for disambiguation from other persons of the same last name in that paragraph. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience. Please read the external links policy before adding more external links.

The following kinds of links are inappropriate:

  • Online discussion groups or chat forums
  • Personal webpages and blogs
  • Multiple links to the same website
  • Fundraising events or groups
  • Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
  • Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)

I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Virginia Satir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]