This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
I sincerely question the sense and fairness of the notability template slapped on this article. A quick look shows that it has sister-articles on 5 other Wikipedias. Have they all failed to recognize this article as non-notable? And a company with a turnover in 2013 of 9.7 billion euro is certainly bigger than your local butcher... Was the a proper WP:BEFORE before slapping down this template? The Bannertalk 05:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The template seems correct - the text does not show notability. Dutch article might explain it, so it is not templated, but our item is terrible and needs maintenance templates. How about you expand this article by translating content from Dutch? Then you can remove the template.GizzyCatBella🍁 14:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How about the deletionist stopping with his campaign against this article? The Bannertalk 15:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A speedy was shot down as being notable enough, a prod was shot down as being notable enough but still it is slapped for notability. Did the original templater do a proper WP:BEFORE before slapping the template? And did he make any effort to improve the article? The Bannertalk 15:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they did. And even the Dutch article, while longer, doesn't seem to be based on very good sources, as far as I can make out with my Google Translate. Thing I am wrong? Perhaps. Prove this by translating the article, so that it shows the readers why this company is notable, and then the template can be removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
