Talk:Vincent Burnelli

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

Difficult personality[edit]

I read an article on the Web several years ago about the life and times of Vincent Burnelli, in which he was described as having a difficult personality. He apparently was fairly pushy with his ideas, and unwilling to compromise or negotiate. He presented his lifting body design concepts to a number of major U.S. aircraft manufacturers in the hope of getting them into production, but his proposals were rejected, not so much because the designs were so radically different from conventional aircraft, but because of his unbending attitude. If someone could dig up this information for inclusion into the Wikipedia article, it would help flesh out the story. Even though Burnelli didn't see his lifting body aircraft go into passenger and freight service, the ideas are still being considered and most recently have been revived in the Boeing X-48. —Quicksilver^{T @} 20:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're not "flying wings"[edit]

Burnelli's lifting-fuselage designs are by no stretch of the imagination "flying wings." This is the definition of a flying wing from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary: "A tailless aircraft that has the form of a left and right wing joined together at the midline with little or no apparent fuselage <Engineers call it a flying wing, or “blended wing body”. Gone is the familiar cylindrical fuselage … . Instead, the craft has a pair of thick, swept-back wings with the engines embedded inside. The tail is also gone, replaced by gyroscopes and raised “winglets” that help keep the plane stable. — Bennett Daviss, New Scientist, 24 Feb. 2007." As can easily be seen, Burnelli's design is hardly tailless, and it certainly has a fuselage.173.62.11.254 (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you are wrong, but this is a matter of semantics only. Admittedly, this is a dictionary so semantics do have their importance. So, yes, "lifting body" or "lifting fuselage" is the more correct term to describe these designs. Jan olieslagers (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]