Talk:Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, 9th Duke of Portland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Calling him "the duke" before he inherits?[edit]

Cavendish-Bentinck is referred to throughout this article as "the duke". However, he didn't inherit the dukedom until he was 83, long after most of the events in his life being described, and as an heir presumptive, he presumably wasn't even entitled to a courtesy title during this period. Is it proper to call him "the duke" retroactively" like this? I'm totally ignorant of UK peerage protocol, so I'm curious, but it does strike me as odd. --Jfruh (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He WAS specifically granted the style,rank,and precedence of the younger son of a duke in 1977,early in his time as heir presumptive to his brother...this was mentioned in Who's Who (1981 edition page 447,for example).But until their cousin died in 1977 he and his brother were known by their knighthoods.12.144.5.2 (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, 9th Duke of Portland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]