Talk:Veteran's pension

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Deliberately US-Centric[edit]

Not sure why the US grabbed this article. Many, if not most, countries give veteran's pensions. The high level article should describe that and give the history from the Roman legions on. Student7 (talk) 23:40, 12:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, neither the subject nor title is US-specific. I've marked it as such with {{globalize}}. Superm401 - Talk 07:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Renamed. Can't see any viable way of rescuing this from US-Centrism without totally degutting the article. Until we see articles on other countries, I don't know how we can generalize more than a vague paragraph or so. Student7 (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Military History Task Force Classification[edit]

This article doesn't appear to really fit in any of the given classifications for the Military History Project. It currently fits in the US task force, but I don't feel it should be there really because I agree with the above unsigned comment that this article shouldn't be only about the US. Suggestions? Sabre ball (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why it wouldn't fit military history. Pensions have gone on a long time. Student7 (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]