Talk:Vermont Senate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Progressive need shade of blue?[edit]

I would suggest here, as in the house, progressives need a shade of blue. I suspect that they seldom caucus with Republicans, but probably often enough with Democrats. Student7 (talk) 00:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which voting system?[edit]

The article doesn't state which voting system is used to elect the multi-member districts? Does the elector vote for more than one candidate (which would be bloc voting or limited voting) or does she vote for only one (which would be the SNTV method)?

A voter may "bullet-ballot" by voting for only one candidate when s/he is eligible to vote for two. Or the voter may vote for two. I don't have a reference. These are in politically cohesive areas where they have historically wanted to vote for all candidates in that area to represent everybody and they are not particular about what town they come from, even if it's not their town. Student7 (talk) 00:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VSHSenate14.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:VSHSenate14.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]