Talk:Veremund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

VERMUND > VERMUD (?)[edit]

Well, it's unclear wether Vermund could become Vermud in good Spanish, Galician, or Portuguese fonetic evolution. I mean, "normal" evolution would be:

  • Wermund(o) > Vermundo (or *Guermundo) > Vermondo/Bermondo (short u becoming short o: [u] > [o], as do all the western romance languages)

There's no normal way for a group like [nd] or [nt] to become [d] (though it would be possible [nd] > [nn]), and there's not a standard or, in galician, metaphonical way for the short u in mund, not to become o in romance.

Vermud/Bermud is probably another name, with secod element not mund, but mōþ. The large o would render as large u in the local romance, the becoming simply u.

  • Wermōþo > *Vermūdo > Vermudo/Vermudo

This element *mōþ is present in others Galician or Portuguese medieval names like the femenine Modildi (< proto-germanic *Mōþehildi) later becoming Muilli).

So, the presence of -u- in the pan-hispanic name Bermudo/Vermudo, and the presence of -nd- in Vermund, are evidences against the proposition. I don't considere them to be the same name (but I don't publish, lol).

--Cadroiolos (talk) 12:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but is it not equally true that scribes writing in Latin used Veremundus and Veremudus interchangeably (as far as I know it is)? In a period before the standardisation of spellings and while the writers were employing a language (Latin) not native to them, the actual Germanic root of the words are sometimes almost irrelevant. Srnec (talk) 04:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Veremund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]