Talk:Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleVeerapandiya Kattabomman (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 6, 2015Good article nomineeListed
March 15, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 21, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Sivaji Ganesan won Best Actor for Veerapandiya Kattabomman at the 1960 Afro-Asian Film Festival, becoming the first Indian actor to win in that category in an international film festival?
Current status: Good article

Fair use rationale for Image:Veerapandiya Kattabomman.jpg[edit]

Image:Veerapandiya Kattabomman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M. G. Naidu was one of the leading costume designer in indian film industry.[edit]

M. G. Naidu was one of the leading costume designer in indian film industry. He was a personal costumer for famous actors like M.G.R., Shivaji, NTR, Rajkumar, Dilip Kumar, Rajinikanth and Kamalahasan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukuhills123 (talkcontribs) 10:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useful sources[edit]

Useful info from these sources can be added to the article:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 10:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this may take up to 10 days as I have several others reviews to do, some work I need to do and it's Easter time. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production
  • Where was the notice issued asking for information in 1953?
Done. changed it to "a notice was issued at Vasan's production company, Gemini Studios through Ananda Vikatan" — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Salem?
Linked to Salem district. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Padmini, O. A. K. Thevar, and V. K. Ramasamy were chosen to play Vellaiyammal, Oomaithurai and Ettappan respectively.[2] S. Varalakshmi was chosen" -rep of "chosen"
Done. Tweaked the sentence. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Panthulu introduces the film by adopting director Cecil B. DeMille's tactic of personally introducing the film on camera" -rep of introduces the film
How about, "Panthulu adopted American director Cecil B. DeMille's tactic of personally introducing the film on camera."? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Music
  • It might be obvious to you/Indians but what is Mukhari? Link?
Got the link. It is derived from the Kharaharapriya raga. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Inaccuracies
  • "The film was well made but failed" -well-made according to whom?
Ask Ssven. But I feel it is irrelevant here. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant? Claiming the film was well made is POV unless you attribute it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Tweaked the sentence. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Legacy
  • "Vari, vatti, kisthi...Yaarai ketkirai vari...Etharkku ketkirai vari. Vaanam polikirathu, bhumi vilaigirathu, unakken katta vendum vari....", -this should be translated in a footnote ideally.
Pathetically, the source I got it from has many other dialogues with translations given, but not for this! . And there is another source which has only the translation and not the original Tamil text. I'll use it soon. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Refs
  • What makes mohanramanmuses.blogspot.in. a RS?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it is Mohan V. Raman's own blog. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the film and enjoyed it, although I felt some of the war scenes were poorly executed and amateurish, testament to a limited budget I'd guess. Like he'd fall off the fort and then it would look like he just dived on the floor to film the next part! And guns fired at the fort some of them just looked like somebody prodding a plaster wall behind it! Still, it was very good. Its a pity there isn't more info on things like costumes and set design here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How did you see the film? Online or CD, and were there subtitles? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before I have my sources.. And I also live near one of the biggest south Asian communities in the UK..♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: As for costumes and set design, couldn't get the info as most of the articles concentrated on Sivaji Ganesan's acting rather than the film's making. Also, it was through this film that he was established as a superstar alongside MGR. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All done?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Just the translation of the dialogue left. Kailash said he would use a reference containing the translation. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Nothing stopping it from being promoted though. Good job! A happy Easter to you both!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Thanks, Doc. I have already sent you my wishes through the Bunny. Nevertheless, Happy Easter to you and Kailash. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]