Talk:Vancouver Sun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

Vancouver Sun → The Vancouver Sun – {The "The" in the newspaper's name is part of its official title}

Moved. This clearly follows Wikipedia's naming conventions. --Stemonitis 11:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Tower photo[edit]

Added the photo to spice up the article. Even though it's not that relevant to the paper any more, I think it's significant to have a building still named after it, over forty years after it left. Usgnus 23:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Vancouver Sun.jpg[edit]

Image:Vancouver Sun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biased[edit]

The author of this article accuses The Vancouver Sun of suppressing news about labour and the environment. Yet there are no supporting references or proof. This article is quite biased as it now stands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdrinkwater (talkcontribs) 14:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

why no mention of any controversy? the Sun is widely considered to be the most right leaning newspaper in BC. It is heavily pro-Israel and its columnists fully support the continued blockade of Gaza and occupation of Palestine. Just read this column by one of the papers head writers http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Cool+heads+must+prevail+inquiry+into+Israel+raid/3096111/story.html

A reliable source mentioning any "controversy" would be needed for this. Being pro-Israel is not controversial per se in a Western country... --Roentgenium111 (talk) 21:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

only current masthead staff listed[edit]

This article needs a lot of work to cover its history and roster of noted writers over the years Category:Vancouver Sun people I've added some to who already had articles.

It's also being treated as an ad/directory listing; I'll remove the address in the infobox, for instance.Skookum1 (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Vancouver Sun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Vancouver Sun/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article has good basic outline, but needs fleshing out.

Last edited at 03:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)