Talk:Usumacinta River

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Introduction text[edit]

The text in the introduction of this article appears to be quite similar to the entry in Encyclopædia Britannica. I wonder whether or not this would constitute an infringement of copyright. For the moment I only added a reference to Encyclopædia Britannica, but the intro might have to be re-written . Please comment. Arjuno 08:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the pick-up. Whether or not it is similar or lengthy enough to constitute copyvio, it's not a good look to have imitative passages. I would recommend rewrite, and obtaining viable sources from elsewhere than EB in any case. IMO one generalist encyclopaedia citing another is not really appropriate, better to cut out the middleman and go direct to the authorative sources. --cjllw ʘ TALK 02:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]