Talk:University of Cambridge Primary School
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Notability[edit]
I agree that a page for every school is not generally justified (although a majority of schools, secondary at least, do have pages). However in this case the school has been making headlines throughout its short history as the first primary University Training School, and is being closely observed by the media as the pioneer and model for that scheme, as well as for its links with the University of Cambridge. (See links to the articles in the Telegraph and Guardian as a starting point.) I can scarce imagine how any primary school could attract more notability, so either we delete all primary school articles (and then get to work deleting secondary schools) or accept that this passes the criteria. Smb1001 (talk) 10:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. The issue is that the article subject needs to have significant coverage. The subject of most of the coverage already referenced is the University, not the school and WP:INHERIT means that doesn't pass on to the school. I am personally not convinced it passes WP:GNG. And WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES suggests that there is a good chance WP:AFD would result in a merge to the University of Cambridge article where it could have it's own little section. I'm happy to have a wider discussion somewhere if you like. CalzGuy (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)