Talk:University of Bonn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeUniversity of Bonn was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 22, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

links to Humboldt University in Berlin ?[edit]

from a similar (former) name, do two universities have any links to each other ? -- 210.213.2.74 15:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold[edit]

This article is well written but needs some more improvement

  • For a very in-depth article, the lead needs to be expanded to give a more comprehensive summary of the whole article
  • The article should point out that Joseph Ratzinger was the future Pope Benedict XVI
  • The article lacks sources. The first paragraph has no source. Nor does the vast part of the history section
  • Wikilinks on years need to be consistent - either link all or link none.
  • The history section is well written and informative. It just needs sources
  • Year spans should be written 1901–1944 and not 1901-1945.
  • Comma consistency in numbers needed. Some use "10,000" and others "2,500" [no commas]
  • There are some minor grammar issues to be ironed out, eg "The university also confers about 800 Ph.D.'s [sic]" and "the teacher's [sic] education" and other similar glitches. Asian and Oriental need to be capitalised
  • "300 million Euro" - is the plural Euro(s)?
  • Shouldn't things like "Deparment of Economics" be caps as they are proper nouns? In many places, these things are not capitalised
  • "treating the history of the early Christians in the late antiquity" - should this be "treating the history of the early Christians to the late antiquity"??
  • For the research institutions section, it would be better to prosify it if possible. also the refs
  • In the research section, the persistent use of "University of Bonn" is somewhat repetitive
  • The referencing appears to the main deficiency
  • The other main lack of content appears to be about university politics. Perhaps in Germany, everything is nice and all the focus is on quality and raising skill levels :) and there are no political and business problems like there are in Australia :(. In Australia, there are usually controversies every now and then like pay-students, overseas pay-students from China to raise revenue, accusations that the university is interested in making money rather than focusing on standards and quality, business deals etc. Also there is nothing about how the university is operated - university council, policy making and those sorts of things.
  • There is nothing about student clubs and extra-curricular things. Are there sports clubs, choirs and orchestras at this university??
  • The article also needs more independent sources. At the moment there is too much emphasis on official university paraphernalia

Best regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing was happening, so the artilce has been failed. Blnguyen (photo straw poll) 08:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonn-fl19.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
  • File:Bonn-fl19.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Poppschloss und Bot.Garten 04.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We do not normally make a separate article for researchcentres of this sort-- insufficient separate notability DGG ( talk ) 06:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on University of Bonn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on University of Bonn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source article is not notable enough to remain standalone; contents can be used to expand existing paragraph under section 'Research institutes' DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]