Talk:United States Senate Committee on Rules and Administration

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled[edit]

Bob Bennett will be the new ranking member, not Thad Cochran as the article indicates.

Merge proposal[edit]

I disagree with the merge proposal. The successor committee (Rules & Admin) is not just the same as the predecessor (Rules). R&A absorbed four other committee when its name was changed in 1947.—Markles 21:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Markles. older ≠ wiser 22:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per Markles. Politics rule 20:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as nobody has come here in support of the merge, I am going to go ahead and remove the proposal meamemg 23:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in United States Senate Committee on Rules and Administration[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of United States Senate Committee on Rules and Administration's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Independent":

From United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Sens. Sanders and King are independent, but caucus with Democrats.
From United States Senate Committee on Armed Services: Sens. Lieberman and King were elected as Independents, but caucused with Democrats on the committee.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]