Talk:United States Army Ordnance Corps

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Logistics / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military logistics and medicine task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States Army Ordnance Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't Ordnance Corp disbanded?[edit]

I don't have the dates, but I know that an investigation was launched after the M16 stirred up enough controversy to catch Congress' attention. The actions Ordnance Corp took was described as "criminally negligent" and "borderline treason."

For added context, Ordnance Corp was in charge of overseeing the adoption of the M16, but did not like the M16. So, they issued the rifle without cleaning kits, rushed it into service without proper durability testing, and swapped the approved gunpowder to surplus powder from WW2.

The justification for all this was to make the M14 look better, which was designed by Ordnance Corp.

Since then, the US Military as an industry has been effectively banned from developing its own equipment, as having to choose between "in shop" vs "out shop" options leads to an inevitable conflict of interest.

SmallArmsSolutions made an excellent series of videos on the M14 and M16 in Vietnam and points to several reputable sources. He is also a firearms historian formerly employed by Colt. 2600:8807:874A:5800:9757:FA12:9BCB:1440 (talk) 06:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]