A fact from United Socialist Party (Romania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that following the ban of its labour unions in 1934, the Romanian United Socialist Party would rely on its youth and women's wings for political action?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: AGF acceptance of offline and foreign language sources, good read. New enough, long enough, hook is short enough and interesting enough for me. AGF on copyright, enough of it is written simply that I think translation vio is unlikely. Well sourced and neutral. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
AGF acceptance of offline and foreign language sources, good read. New enough, long enough, hook is short enough and interesting enough for me. AGF on copyright, enough of it is written simply that I think translation vio is unlikely. Well sourced and neutral. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)