Talk:United National Workers' Party

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

This is NOT a “far right” political party, they were directly modelled after North Korea

"Some consider it an example of leftist politics, others, a fall under fascism; for some it would be a clear reflection of Franco’s regime, for others the fanciful product of a sick mind." [1] The reference to North Korea is only supposed by one writer on Suite101, a now-defunct Wordpress "blog and magazine" site. (source 10). Wakari07 (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an absolute joke, you morons find an excuse to call anything “fascist” IT WAS A SOCIALIST PARTY. Stop calling anything that’s remotely authoritarian “fascist” this site is a mockery of real facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.182.138.19 (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

source this claim please Carlp941 (talk) 22:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a fascist party, it was explicitly left wing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.186.109.177 (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

support this statement with some sources, please. Carlp941 (talk) 22:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@142.186.109. political parties of dictators, especially in africa used whatever ideology possible to win support, it doesn't mean the party was actually socialist

in post colonial africa there were a lot of socialist sentiment and nguema called his party socialist to win the populace

its the same with the NSDAP, but you wouldn't call them socialist would you? 176.91.32.23 (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colors[edit]

Special:Diff/1031038253 Please find a WP:RS for the infobox claim that its color was red. Wakari07 (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

mistranslation[edit]

"único" means only or unique in spanish, not united. that would be "unido" as in Estados Unidos (US) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2803:9800:9504:7B33:D973:7310:557A:AC54 (talk) 01:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Far left party[edit]

This party was openly Marxist as was Nguema, this is blatant academic dishonesty to label the party as “far right”. 142.116.104.228 (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nguema called himself a "Hitlerian-Marxist"

Given that "Hitlerian-Marxism" is not a real ideological tradition, I do not think this should carry any weight. I can buy "Socialist" as a label but Nguema's party was an ideological goulash, even at its most clear. Calling it left or right wing doesn't really suit the party. It was an outgrowth of the state that existed primarily to torture and pillage their countrymen. Ideology wasn't really important. Carlp941 (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So? There are many "communist" countries that are not in the slightest communist, for example china. It is blatant dishonesty to labil the party as "socialist". Pick up a book American 2bad2based (talk) 22:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]