Talk:Ullmann reaction
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
OrganoCuprates?[edit]
R-X > R-Cu-X ? X=I does not exist as Cupric compound. More likely 2Cu + R-I > R-Cu + CuI as a complex. Shjacks45 (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/ullmann-reaction.shtm good place to start — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeongbean (talk • contribs) 17:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 7 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jeongbean, Aromatic Thiol (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Erdabravest2001, Primary resource, Paoof, Chmstr.
— Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review[edit]
Lead: It doesn't seem like a new lead was added? The original lead, however, was very good, so I think this is okay.
Content: Content added is very informative! I enjoyed reading about the history of the Ullmann reaction, as well as how it was developed. I think adding more section headings could be useful: the section added seems like a history section, but the current article does not have a history section.
Tone and Balance: Tone is neutral and not biased towards any side!
Sources and References: Might be good to add a few more references, especially since they're discussing a very chemical topic. I think the history section would benefit a lot from additional references, as well as the explanation of the mechanism! As well, the addition of internal links to other wikipedia pages could be useful.
Images and Media: No images or media is added, but the original page has quite a few images so this is okay!
Overall Impressions: Could be good to title different the sections with subtitles to emphasize separation! For example, Current State can be a subheading of History and Development. As well, adding a diagram of the mechanism could be very helpful rather than just explaining it in words. I think the history context of this reaction is very interesting, and I'm glad it was added! Chmstr (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)