Talk:USS Truxtun (DDG-103)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

POLITICAL POINT OF VIEW OF USA[edit]

"This modest U.S. show of force – a single warship to the Black Sea – was intended to calm the nerves of former Soviet republics and satellites nervous about Moscow’s actions in invading and taking the Crimea province in the Ukraine,[9] and was meant as ‘strategic reassurance.’[10]"

The USA might see it this way, but the Russian administration and the present Crimean administration will view this quite differently. Should be rephrased or deleted. Can orignal poster take care of it, please. Edmond V.O. Katusz (talk) 12:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]